SICP Progress (Was Re: Section 1.1 Exercises (Responses Have Answers))

[Brad Beyenhof]

On Jan 25, 2008 9:17 PM, Mark Schoonover <mark.schoonover at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/26/08, Brad Beyenhof <bbeyenhof at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2008 8:42 PM, Mark Schoonover <mark.schoonover at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Well, I don't know if I won since it took me almost the entire week of
> > > thinking  about it before I had that aha moment!
> >
> > Speaking of "taking all week," how should the schedule be going? If
> > we're sticking to one lecture per week, MIT-OCW says we should be
> > having L3 next Monday, with the 1.1 exercises, Problem Set 1, and
> > Project 0 all due then (not to mention reading 1.2 in the text).
> >
> > I haven't even read the L2 notes yet, though I should be able to get
> > through them tomorrow. As for Problem Set 1, I don't even know where
> > to find that. How is everybody doing with all this?
>
> Well, I wasn't really trying to stick to the exact calendar, just what do we
> need to do. I'm planning on moving on to the next section tomorrow.

The main reason I mentioned it is that the whole iteration/recursion
discussion here looks like it was triggered by Section 1.2 of the SICP
text. Should we be trying to stay together? As I mentioned above, I'm
just getting started on L2 and I've not even begun reading 1.2.

-- 
Brad Beyenhof                                 http://augmentedfourth.com
The history of popular music is littered with great partnerships.
Rodgers had his Hammerstein, Lennon had his McCartney, and Lloyd Webber
had... his photocopier...                            ~Humphrey Lyttleton