Why is the ugly "#f" Scheme's FALSE symbol rather than an empty list () ?

chris at seberino.org chris at seberino.org
Fri Jan 25 23:28:07 PST 2008

Previous message: Why does Scheme need both "cond-else" and "if" constructs?
Next message: Why is the ugly "#f" Scheme's FALSE symbol rather than an empty list () ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Call me crazy but wouldn't the empty list, (), make a more elegant
FALSE object for Scheme than "#f"?

Chris

Previous message: Why does Scheme need both "cond-else" and "if" constructs?
Next message: Why is the ugly "#f" Scheme's FALSE symbol rather than an empty list () ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the KPLUG-LPSG mailing list