Unix and C
fpjohnston at gmail.com
Sun May 5 07:15:36 PDT 2013
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Tracy Reed <treed at ultraviolet.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:56:14PM PDT, Franklin Johnston spake thusly:
> > I had no agenda here. I only mentioned OOP because it seems to be the
> > bleeding edge for programming languages at the moment.
> Wah? OOP was bleeding edge for programming languages in the late 80's.
> I'm really not sure what bleeding edge for programming languages is now.
> tempted to say functional or purely functional but even those projects have
> been around since the 80's and are only on my radar now because they have
> gained a tiny amoung of popularity.
That was kind of my point.
> > I think another issue with such languages as Java is that they aren't
> > compiled but are rather interpreted. I don't know that that would work
> > an O/S either.
> This distinction means less and less. Particularly in Java's case. I
> compile my
> Java before I run it whereupon it is compiled again "JIT" to native machine
So, what I'm hearing is that my guesses as to why other languages besides C
aren't being used for operating systems are incorrect. Maybe it's just that
there isn't much development of new operating systems, and therefore no
pressing need to consider other languages?
More information about the KPLUG-List