https & ssh the only wifi security necessary?
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade
gkade at unnerving.org
Sun Jul 3 10:11:27 PDT 2005
On Jul 2, 2005, at 11:18 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> ...and imaps or pop3s
Don't forget SMTP/TLS, unless you want your mail sending to be
> At 10:13 PM 7/2/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>> I don't know if I should bother messing with wifi security, IPSEC
>> and other such mind numbing silliness when ssh and https provide
>> security whenever passwords are concerned.
>> Does everyone do the wifi security thing or just rely on
>> ssh and https to carry the day?
Personally, at home, I have 128-bit WEP enabled. Sure, it's
breakable. Sure, it's a hassle to set up on each machine. On the
other hand, I bought most of my equipment before WPA was available,
and don't feel like upgrading/replacing it.
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade <gkade at unnerving.org>
OpenPGP Key ID: EAF4844B keyserver: pgpkeys.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-list/attachments/20050703/9f4e901f/PGP-0001.pgp
More information about the KPLUG-List