The SDCS coup
rshimizu at consultant.com
Mon May 10 15:39:16 PDT 2004
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." <bsder at allcaps.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: kplug-list at kernel-panic.org
Subject: Re: The SDCS coup
> On Mon, 10 May 2004, Randall Shimizu wrote:
> > I agree that hiring a attorney is probably not warranted since we have a
> > copy of the bylaws.. On the otherhand I feel that we should consider
> > forming our own 501(3)c that is a member or SDCS. If not we should
> > consider formulating a course of action that can be implemented should
> > the situation necessitate it.
> Why? If you are a member of SDCS, you are bound by *their* bylaws whether
> you are a 501(3)c or not.
Not sure since a 501(3)c is a corporation and therefore it's own entity.
Being a 501(3)c and a member of SDCS means you
> get all the crud and *still* are subject to SDCS jurisidiction.
> If this bothers you so much, you should have run for the SDCS board.
Well I have been a active member of SDCS. Secondly I was unaware that the SDMUG members would play such a pre-dominant role...
> Besides, given that SDMUG charges dues and has significantly better
> attendance than KPLUG (think order of magnitude), SDMUG had *far* more to
> fear from KPLUG controlling the SDCS than KPLUG has from SDMUG controlling
> the SDCS.
You have a good point, I just feel that we need to fully understand the ramifications of the recent changes in the
> list archives http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?4
> To unsubscribe, send a message to the address shown in the list-unsubscribe
> header of this message.
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
More information about the KPLUG-List