okay, not kplug group for explicit email
rbrwill at pacbell.net
Tue Mar 5 02:24:36 PST 2002
Tsk, Tsk Lan...
That Ivy league moral relatavist thing popped its head up didn't it ?
Now before anyone gets to worked up, Lan already knows I'm teasing him hard
and really I'm getting at him for making me read the entire thread (beyond
the helpful reply's from Tracy and Mark and others) to figure out where the
heck "church" and "tithes" comments come into this discussion...
I'm going to look into some of the "spam" suggestions because I've been
getting a larger amount of junkmail lately too...
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 06:01 pm, you wrote:
> On 5 Mar, Stephen Cope wrote:
> > Lan Barnes wrote:
> >> may be a pornographer just trying to make a buck so he can afford
> >> to tithe to his church.
> > You suck at the humour.
> A direct attack, Stephen? And a slighty incomprehensible one at
> that ... not like you.
> > According to a pornographer, spamming is practiced only by newcomers to
> > the pornography trade, and response rate is so ridiculously low it is
> > not worth it. (1:10,000? 1:100,000)
> >> list archives http://www.ultraviolet.org
> > GET IN TEH JAIL!
> You _are_ having a bad clarity day. Hey, I don't expect to always
> be agreed with on my laissez faire attitude towards human
> sexuality, but I do dislike confusing replies.
More information about the KPLUG-List