GPG sig checking WAS: GnuPG Keysigning Party HOWTO
pacneil at linuxgeek.net
Tue Sep 18 12:28:11 PDT 2001
What changed was my mail reader. I converted from pine to mutt and from
inline signatures to mime encoded signature attachments, which I'm told
is the "right way" to do it.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:38:17AM -0700, Wade Curry conjectured:
> Neil Schneider(pacneil at linuxgeek.net)@Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:39:21PM -0700:
> > Thinking about having this, soon.
> > http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html
> Sometime after Sun. 9/16, something in your GPG setup changed and
> I've strated getting the following messages. The first part is
> normal, but the last line is new. Is there something about *my*
> setup that should be changed to accommodate/deal with this? Or is
> this a gotcha that the originator has to look out for?
---end quoted text---
Neil Schneider pacneil at linuxgeek.net
In character, in manners, in style, in all things, the supreme excellence is
simplicity. - Longfellow
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-list/attachments/20010918/b09fdf00/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the KPLUG-List